Current:Home > NewsWisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections -CapitalTrack
Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections
View
Date:2025-04-19 02:59:42
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday in a case brought by Republicans who want to bar the use of mobile voting vans in the presidential battleground state.
Such vans — a single van, actually — were used just once, in Racine in 2022. It allowed voters to cast absentee ballots in the two weeks leading up to the election. Racine, the Democratic National Committee and others say nothing in state law prohibits the use of voting vans.
Whatever the court decides will not affect the November election, as a ruling isn’t expected until later and no towns or cities asked to use alternative voting locations for this election before the deadline to do so passed. But the ruling will determine whether mobile voting sites can be used in future elections.
Republicans argue it is against state law to operate mobile voting sites, that their repeated use would increase the chances of voter fraud, and that the one in Racine was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Wisconsin law prohibits locating any early voting site in a place that gives an advantage to any political party. There are other limitations on early voting sites, including a requirement that they be “as near as practicable” to the clerk’s office.
For the 2022 election, Racine city Clerk Tara McMenamin and the city “had a goal of making voting accessible to as many eligible voters as possible, and the voting locations were as close as practicable to the municipal clerk’s office while achieving that goal and complying with federal law,” the city’s attorney argued in filings with the court.
Racine purchased its van with grant money from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a nonprofit funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
Wisconsin voters in April approved a constitutional amendment banning the use of private money to help run elections.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled for two weeks across the city, allowing voters to cast in-person absentee ballots in 21 different locations.
Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. He argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
“Whether McMenamin’s intention was to create this turnout advantage for Democrats or not, that is precisely what she did through the sites she selected,” Brown argued in a brief filed with the state Supreme Court.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the 2022 election, saying there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. Brown sued.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Today’s news: Follow live updates from the campaign trail from the AP.
- Ground Game: Sign up for AP’s weekly politics newsletter to get it in your inbox every Monday.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
Brown sued, and in January, a Racine County Circuit Court judge sided with Republicans, ruling that state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in June kept that ruling in place pending its consideration of the case, which effectively meant the use of mobile voting sites would not be allowed in the upcoming presidential election. The court also kept in place the same rules that have been in place since 2016 for determining the location of early voting sites. The deadline for selecting those sites for use in the November election was in June.
veryGood! (7267)
Related
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Alo Yoga's 40% Off Sale Has Bras Starting at $34 & We Can't Click Fast Enough
- Heavy fighting in south Gaza as Israel presses ahead with renewed US military and diplomatic support
- Save 56% On the Magical Good American Jeans That Still Fit Me After 30 Pounds of Weight Fluctuation
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Texas AG Ken Paxton files petition to block Kate Cox abortion, despite fatal fetal diagnosis
- Former Kentucky Gov. Julian Carroll dies at age 92
- France says one of its warships was targeted by drones from direction of Yemen. Both were shot down
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Minnesota grocery store clerk dies after customer impales him with a golf club, police say
Ranking
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- 'Zombie deer' disease has been reported in more than half the US: What to know about CWD
- Police chase in Philadelphia ends in shootout that leaves 2 officers, suspect wounded
- At COP28, sticking points remain on fossil fuels and adapting to climate as talks near crunch time
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Military-themed brewery wants to open in a big Navy town. An ex-SEAL is getting in the way
- Heisman odds: How finalists stack up ahead of Saturday's trophy ceremony
- Bachelor Nation Status Check: Who's Still Continuing Their Journey After Bachelor in Paradise
Recommendation
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Thousands demonstrate against antisemitism in Berlin as Germany grapples with a rise in incidents
Homes damaged by apparent tornado as severe storms rake Tennessee
Chris Evert will miss Australian Open while being treated for cancer recurrence
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Judge approves settlement barring U.S. border officials from reviving family separation policy for 8 years
Voters to choose between US Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee and state Sen. John Whitmire for Houston mayor
The NRA has a surprising defender in its free speech case before the Supreme Court: the ACLU