Current:Home > ContactPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -CapitalTrack
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
TrendPulse View
Date:2025-04-09 05:17:25
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (2395)
Related
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Cheating in sports: Michigan football the latest scandal. Why is playing by rules so hard?
- An abortion ban enacted in 1864 is under review in the Arizona Supreme Court
- Krispy Kreme’s 'Day of the Dozens' doughnut deal is here: How to get a $1 box
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Remembering Norman Lear: The soundtrack of my life has been laughter
- Pregnant Bhad Bhabie Reveals Sex of Her First Baby
- Football player Matt Araiza dropped from woman’s rape lawsuit and won’t sue for defamation
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Sports Illustrated publisher Arena Group fires CEO following AI controversy
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Can a potential employer give minors drug test without parental consent? Ask HR
- China-made C919, ARJ21 passenger jets on display in Hong Kong
- Indian police arrest 4 intruders for breaching security in the Parliament complex
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Remembering Norman Lear: The soundtrack of my life has been laughter
- China’s Xi meets with Vietnamese prime minister on second day of visit to shore up ties
- Turkish soccer league suspends all games after team boss Faruk Koca punches referee in the face
Recommendation
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Michigan prosecutors to outline case against false Trump electors in first hearing
Bank of Japan survey shows manufacturers optimistic about economy, as inflation abates
Punter Matt Araiza to be dropped from rape lawsuit as part of settlement with accuser
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Fed expected to stand pat on interest rates but forecast just two cuts in 2024: Economists
Chargers QB Justin Herbert will miss rest of season after undergoing surgery on broken finger
DeSantis’ campaign and allied super PAC face new concerns about legal conflicts, AP sources say